Impact of COVID-19 ­ experiences of 5th year medical students at the university of KwaZulu-natal

Background: The global pandemic associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) had a considerable effect on higher education in South Africa, with online instruction replacing traditional lectures for many students. Medical students were required to vacate their residences in March 2020 but returned to campus in July 2020 to enable them to continue with clinical teaching and learning. The aim of this study was to understand the learning experiences of 5th year medical students at the University of KwaZulu-Natal (UKZN) during 2020. Methods: This was a qualitative study conducted via Zoom in December 2020 with 18 students in four focus group discussions and four semi-structured interviews. These were all facilitated by an independent researcher with experience in qualitative research. All the interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed qualitatively through the identification of codes, categories and themes. Results: The following major themes emerged: A stressful and at times an overwhelming year, mental health issues, developing strategies to cope, and issues that related to teaching and learning. Conclusion: The disruptions caused by COVID-19, the lockdown, a condensed academic programme and uncertainty about their competency resulted in high levels of anxiety and stress among medical students. Participants highlighted strategies that had helped them to cope with the isolation and academic pressures. Given the large volume of work, careful thought needs to be given to what should be taught and how it should be taught to ensure that graduates have the competencies they need to practise.

War in the midst of a pandemic: the synergy accelerating mental health disorders

War and displacement can have long-term and disastrous repercussions on people's mental, emotional, and physical health. Bombardments, invasions, occupation desertion, and being forced to flee diminish people's sense of security. The risk of being hurt or maimed as a result of conflict causes acute dread, which sets in motion other cascades of mental illnesses such as depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder. These mental and emotional impacts are exacerbated by a co-existing pandemic, as migration and populations forced into cramped, dangerous situations are likely to contribute significantly to disease spread, particularly given the current surge of the highly transmissible omicron variant of COVID-19. This threat to life and livelihood eventually leaves some survivors with mental health disorders.

The effect of clinical simulation assessment on stress and anxiety measures in emergency care students

Background: Clinical simulation has become widespread as a training and assessment tool across a range of health professions, including emergency care. As with any form of assessment, simulations may be associated with stress and anxiety ("distress") which may have a negative effect on student performance if demands required by the simulation outweigh the available resources. This study aimed to assess the effect of participation by students in an emergency care simulation on an objective measure of stress and a subjective measure of anxiety. Methods: Heart rate variability (HRV) and scores from a validated state anxiety instrument (the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory) were assessed in 36 emergency medical care students participating in scheduled simulation assessments. Data recorded during a resting control period were used for comparison. Results: HRV variables showed changes in the simulation assessment group suggesting decreased variability and parasympathetic withdrawal, however these were not significantly different to control. Heart rate in the simulation assessment group increased significantly (73.5/min vs. 107.3/min, p < 0.001). State anxiety scores increased significantly both before (33.5 vs. 49.1, p < 0.001) and after (33.5 vs. 60, p < 0.001) the simulation assessment, compared to control. No linear relationship was found between any HRV variables and anxiety scores. Conclusion: Participating in an emergency care simulation assessment significantly elevated levels of anxiety in a group of 36 students, however an objective measure of stress did not identify changes significantly different to those at rest, with the exception of heart rate. The high levels of anxiety documented before and after simulation assessments may have a negative effect on performance and require further investigation